PROBLEM ASPECTS OF INSTITUTIONALIZATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN

Ruslan VALIEIEV, Ricardo Daniel FURFARO

VALIEIEV R., FURFARO R. D. (2023), PROBLEM ASPECTS OF INSTITUTIONALIZATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN.
PHILOSOPHY, ECONOMICS AND LAW REVIEW. Volume 3, no. 2, 195-203

DOI: 10.31733/2786-491X-2023-2-195-203

 

Abstract. The right to be forgotten has been institutionalized in the legal space of Europe and continues to cause debate both due to the high level of competition of this right with other rights and legitimate interests of various individuals, and due to the “transatlantic split” regarding the place of this right in the EU legal system and the US legal system.

The article examines important aspects of the institutionalization and realization of the right to be forgotten, in particular: the search for the origins of its “conflict”; substantiation of search engine operators (and not site owners) as data controllers to whom applicants should contact; determination of the appeal procedure and actions of the controller; settlement of territorial jurisdiction of such disputes; determination of grounds for correction, erasure or blocking of information, etc.

Keywords: search engine operator, personal data controller, personal data processing, transatlantic split, implicit and explicit influence on law.

References

  • Ausloos, J. (2012). The ‘right to be forgotten’ – worth remembering? Computer law & security review, 28 (2), pp. 143-152.
  • Bunn, A. (2015). The curious case of the right to be forgotten. Computer Law & Security Review, 31 (3), pp.336-350.
  • Bygrave, L. (2014). A right to be forgotten? Communications of the ACM, 58 (1), pp. 35-37.
  • Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. URL : https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ TXT/?uri=CELEX:31995L0046
  • Dowdell, J. (2016). An American Right to Be Forgotten. Tulsa L. Rev., 52, 311.
  • Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v. Agencia de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja Gonzales [C-131/12CJEU]. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX% 3A62012CJ0131.
  • Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 September, 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Google LLC, successor in law to Google Inc. Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés (CNIL). URL : https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf;jsessionid=36C361D99704C36D62 323CF10778E440?text=&docid=220883.
  • Kokhanovska, O. (2019). Informatsiia fizychnoi osoby pro sebe yak osobyste nemainove blaho i pravo buty zabutym v konteksti informatsiinoho pryvatnoho prava [Information of an individual about himself / herself as a personal non-property good and the right to be forgotten in the context of information private law]. Actual problems of intellectual, information and IT law, pp. 102-108. [in Ukr.].
  • Razmietaieva, Iu. (2017). Zalyshte mene u spokoi abo pravo buty zabutym [Leave me alone or the right to be forgotten] Human rights: philosophical, theoretical, legal and political science dimensions, pp. 221-234. [in Ukr.].
  • Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European parliament and of the council on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) of 27 April 2016. URL : https://ogdpr.eu/en/gdpr-2016-679
  • Rosen, J. (2011). The right to be forgotten. Stan. L. Rev. Online, 64, 88.
  • Stone, A. & Schauer, F. (Eds.). (2021). The Oxford Handbook of Freedom of Speech. Oxford University Press.
  • Tirosh, N. (2017). Reconsidering the “Right to be Forgotten” – memory rights and the right to memory in the new media era. Media, Culture & Society, 39 (5), pp. 644-660.
  • Valieiev, R. (2014). Zahalna kharakterystyka konstytutsiinoho prava na osvitu [General characteristics of the constitutional right to education]. Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University: a collection of scientific papers. Series “Legal Sciences”, 1, pp. 49-54.
  • Waldron, J. (1989). Rights in conflict. Ethics, 99 (3), pp. 503-519.
  • Walker, R. (2012). The right to be forgotten. Hastings LJ, 64, 257.
  • Weber, R. (2011). The right to be forgotten: More than a Pandora’s box. J. Intell. Prop. Info. Tech. & Elec. Com. L., 2, 120.
Views: 264